将其尺寸与两个版本的 Galaxy Book4 Pro/Edge 16(12.5/12.3 毫米）相比，Zenbook S 16（11-13 毫米）显然更胜一筹。此外，这些设备的重量都不是很重，三者的重量均在 1.5 千克左右。反过来，所有其他对比设备都要厚得多，也明显重得多。紧凑型 65 瓦电源仅增加了 190 克（包括电缆）。

尺寸比较

Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - 2x USB-C 4.0 和 USB-A现代设备配备 USB-C 端口（这里指的是 4.0 标准）并不奇怪。然而，如此纤薄的机壳还配备了普通的 USB-A 接口，这确实非常罕见，更不用说这一功能在日常使用中是多么实用了。如果能满足我们一个愿望的话，我们希望在右侧配备第二个 USB-C 端口，这样就可以从两侧为设备充电了。

左：HDMI 2.1、2 个 USB-C 4.0（40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0）、3.5 毫米音频接口

右侧SD 读卡器，USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbit/s)SD 读卡器设备右侧有一个功能齐全的 SD 读卡器，插入时，卡会从开口处微微伸出。它的性能令人印象深刻，与我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）一起使用时，我们发现最高传输速率超过了 250 MB/s，而在复制图像文件时，我们测得的传输速率仍然超过了 150 MB/s。

SD Card Reader

average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)

151 MB/s Average of class Multimedia (21.1 - 198, n=41, last 2 years)

94.6 MB/s -37%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)

76.8 MB/s -49%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)

76.6 MB/s -49%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)

28.1 MB/s -81%maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)

256.9 MB/s Average of class Multimedia (27.4 - 262, n=41, last 2 years)

133.3 MB/s -48%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)

87.8 MB/s -66%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)

81.9 MB/s -68%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)

28.9 MB/s -89%

交流焊接式无线局域网模块Zenbook S 16 配备了联发科技的全新 WLAN 模块。MT9725 支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准和蓝牙 5.4。此外，它还能轻松媲美目前高通笔记本电脑内的 FastConnect 7800 模块，不过在与华硕的参考路由器配合使用时，MT9725 的速度要稍快一些，尤其是在发送数据时。总之，这些结果都非常出色，我们在测试过程中没有遇到笔记本电脑的 Wi-Fi 连接问题。

NetworkingAsus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1828 (min: 1755) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1754 (min: 1730) MBit/s ∼100%

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm FastConnect 7800 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1588 (min: 1549) MBit/s ∼87%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1749 (min: 1685) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1606 (min: 1582) MBit/s ∼99%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1669 (min: 1569) MBit/s ∼100%

Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1171 (min: 541) MBit/s ∼64%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1393 (min: 1209) MBit/s ∼79%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

685 (min: 588) MBit/s ∼42%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

999 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼60%

HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrMediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1608 (min: 1424) MBit/s ∼88%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1551 (min: 1450) MBit/s ∼88%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1626 (min: 1381) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1639 (min: 1591) MBit/s ∼98%

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1625 (min: 1307) MBit/s ∼89%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1666 (min: 1613) MBit/s ∼95%

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

671 (min: 610) MBit/s ∼37%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

901 (min: 877) MBit/s ∼51%

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1828 (1755-1892) Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1754 (1730-1771)

网络摄像头总的来说，这款 1080p 网络摄像头的画质只能算一般。当然，用户也可以使用 Windows 先进的 Studio Effects。此外，该摄像头还安装了红外模块，可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。

8.6 ∆E10.6 ∆E12.8 ∆E11.2 ∆E12 ∆E6.7 ∆E12.6 ∆E12.6 ∆E15 ∆E7.3 ∆E8.7 ∆E9.6 ∆E6.6 ∆E9.7 ∆E17.4 ∆E4.4 ∆E13.7 ∆E12.1 ∆E2.7 ∆E8 ∆E8.1 ∆E7.9 ∆E4.7 ∆E6.9 ∆EColorChecker Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: 9.59 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 17.37 ∆E

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W

维护机箱底盖用几颗 Torx 螺钉（T5）固定，拆卸起来非常容易。笔记本电脑的内部结构以大电池（旋入式）为主，同时，你会发现它的小风扇非常小。M.2 2280 固态硬盘可以更换，而无线局域网模块和内存则是焊接上去的。

内部建设

可更换 M.2 2280 固态硬盘可持续性Zenbook S 16 的产品页面没有提供任何关于生产过程中二氧化碳排放量或可回收材料使用比例的信息。其包装主要由纸板组成，但也有一些塑料元素。华硕本身也没有提供任何维修指南。与其他同类产品相比，这款笔记本电脑的功耗相对较低，我们没有注意到它在空闲或待机模式下的功耗有什么明显的特点。

输入设备 - 令人惊喜的舒适键盘纤薄的外壳并没有对键盘造成太大的影响，因为虽然键盘的键程只有 1.1 毫米，但打字的感觉却非常好。至少在普通字母键上是这样，而较大的按键，如回车键或空格键，则感觉有点摇晃，失去了原本的高品质感觉。即便如此，用户还是可以毫不费力地撰写长篇文字，而且键盘明显比 Galaxy Book4 Pro/边缘.白色/蓝色背光有三种亮度可供选择（也可通过传感器自动调节），但最亮的设置几乎太亮，可能会有点刺眼。在这款键盘上还可以找到新的 Copilot 键，以及我们在其他华硕设备上熟悉的小方向键。

输入设备

键盘背光（最高级别）点击板的尺寸为 15 x 9.9 厘米，非常大，在我们的测试中运行完美。它的表面光滑漂亮，机械点击声低沉安静，给人一种高品质的感觉。除了常规的手势操作外，该键盘还支持边缘手势操作（例如通过右侧边缘调节亮度）。虽然它很好用、 华为振动电机的网格效果在这方面仍有优势。

显示屏 - 出色的 120-Hz OLED 显示屏子像素阵列华硕为 Zenbook S 16 配备了一块 16 英寸 OLED 屏幕，但没有触摸屏。它的分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800 像素，长宽比为 16:10，属于三星最新一代 OLED 面板。从主观上看，它的画质令人惊叹，即使是明亮的区域也丝毫没有颗粒感，而且色彩看起来超级鲜艳。它的响应时间一如既往地快如闪电，得益于 120Hz 的刷新率，动作看起来非常流畅。屏幕的亮度和色温可通过传感器自动调节。

在 SDR 模式下，面板亮度超过 400 cd/m²，加上极低的黑值，用户可以享受到令人印象深刻的良好对比度。此外，还支持 HDR 内容，但像往常一样，你必须在 Windows 设置中手动激活 HDR 模式。我们测试设备的最大 HDR 亮度为 525 cd/m²，略高于宣传的 500 cd/m²。不过，Zenbook 的亮度值仍无法接近较小的 OLED 面板（>600 cd/m²）。

405cd/m²402cd/m²404cd/m²404cd/m²407cd/m²397cd/m²409cd/m²405cd/m²409cd/m²

Distribution of brightnessATNA60CL10-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 409 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 404.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.6 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 97 %Center on Battery: 407 cd/m²Contrast: 20350:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}95.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.2CCT: 6453 K

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 HzSamsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 HzDell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1AU Optronics B160QAT, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 90 HzHP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrSamsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 HzSamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 HzXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16", 165 HzDisplay1%-1%0%1%-2% Display P3 Coverage (%)99.999.5 0%99.4 -1%99.6 0%99.5 0%98.8 -1% sRGB Coverage (%)100100 0%100 0%100 0%100 0%100 0% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)95.697.5 2%92.5 -3%96.5 1%97.5 2%89.9 -6%Response Times-29%-5937%-40%-10%-4523% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)0.56 ?(0.3, 0.26)0.64 ?(0.33, 0.31) -14%15.4 ?(8.6, 6.8) -2650%0.8 ?(0.45, 0.35) -43%0.64 ?(0.33, 0.31) -14%39.2 ?(15.8, 18.4) -6900% Response Time Black / White * (ms)0.65 ?(0.35, 0.3)0.68 ?(0.38, 0.3) -5%60.6 ?(56.2, 4.4) -9223%0.89 ?(0.42, 0.47) -37%0.68 ?(0.38, 0.3) -5%14.6 ?(4.4, 10.2) -2146% PWM Frequency (Hz)480240 ?(100)2753.7 ?(100)491.8 ?(100)240 ?(100) PWM Amplitude * (%)3050 -67%Screen-54%-306%-192%-54%-407%Brightness middle (cd/m²)407385 -5%413 1%399.4 -2%385 -5%520 28%Brightness (cd/m²)405391 -3%409 1%405 0%391 -3%510 26%Brightness Distribution (%)9797 0%97 0%98 1%97 0%93 -4%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.020.14 -600%0.35 -1650%Contrast (:1)203502950 -86%1486 -93%Colorchecker dE 2000 *0.61.1 -83%3.48 -480%4.05 -575%1.1 -83%2.9 -383%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *1.21.8 -50%6.97 -481%6.69 -458%1.8 -50%6.2 -417%Greyscale dE 2000 *0.51.4 -180%4.5 -800%1.1 -120%1.4 -180%4.3 -760%Gamma2.2 100%2.24 98%2.15 102%2.27 97%2.24 98%2.19 100%CCT6453 101%6444 101%6446 101%6419 101%6444 101%7422 88%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *1.021.1Total Average (Program / Settings)-27% /

-34%-2081% /

-1102%-77% /

-112%-21% /

-31%-1644% /

-947%* ... smaller is better

CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了测量，华硕一如既往地提供了各种不同的色彩配置文件。我们选择了 "原生 "配置文件作为标准配置，但它所描绘的色彩略微过饱和，看起来有些做作。这使得内容看起来更生动、更艳丽。如果你想选择最精确的配置文件，可以选择 P3 配置文件，它的色彩和灰度偏差非常小。我们无法通过校准来进一步改善屏幕的显示效果，这也是我们在现阶段不提供配置文件下载的原因。此外，华硕还为用户提供了极为精确的 sRGB 模式--此外，P3 和 sRGB 也全部涵盖在内。这意味着 Zenbook S 16 的显示屏可以毫无限制地用于编辑照片和视频。

CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

对比 sRGB

对 P3

对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White0.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.35 ms rise↘ 0.3 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey0.56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3 ms rise↘ 0.26 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 480 HzAmplitude: 30 %The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8101 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

PWM 闪烁（亮度为 0）

PWM 闪烁（亮度为 20）

PWM 闪烁（亮度为 40）

PWM 闪烁（亮度为 60）

PWM 闪烁（亮度为 80）

PWM 闪烁（亮度为 100）该显示屏使用频率为 480 Hz 的 PWM 闪烁，与华硕的所有其他 OLED 面板类似，你可以通过 MyAsus 软件选择所谓的无闪烁 OLED 调光。在亮度不超过 60% 的情况下使用直流调光，其幅度受到限制（如上图所示）。只有在亮度为 60% 或更低时，我们才能在测量过程中识别出完整的振荡曲线。基于软件的调光（选择高屏幕亮度，然后通过软件调光）可避免进入此范围。

在阳光下

室外（白天明亮，无阳光直射）

即使没有触摸屏，OLED 显示屏也具有很强的反光性，在室内使用时有时会产生严重的反光。这种情况在室外会更加严重，尤其是在明亮的日子里，你会想找个阴凉的地方。我们注意到其视角稳定性没有问题。

视角稳定性性能 - 配备 AMD Zen 5（Strix Point）的 ZenbookZenbook S 16 有两种配置可供选择：的 Ryzen AI 9 365(10 核），配备 Radeon 880M、24 GB 内存（LPDDR5x-7500）和 1-TB SSD，以及速度更快的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370(12 核）、32 GB 内存和 2 TB SSD。内存采用焊接方式，无法升级。

测试条件华硕提供各种不同的能耗配置文件，可以通过 MyAsus 软件进行选择。我们在标准模式下进行了以下基准测试和测量，笔记本电脑的能耗水平为 33/28 瓦。性能和全性能这两个所谓更快的配置文件允许消耗的最大功率为 33 瓦，因此在 CPU 测试和连续负载时优势微乎其微，但使用这些模式时 GPU 的性能更弱。设备的噪音也过大（标准模式为 45.8 dB(A)，耳语模式为 36.8 dB(A)，低音模式为 28.9 dB(A)）。

处理器 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370AMD Ryzen AI 300（来源：AMD）Zenbook S 16 配备了新的 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.如果不考虑它极易混淆的名字，这就是 AMD 新推出的移动处理器，TDP 等级为 15-54 瓦，因此实际上是之前 U 和 HS 型号的组合。不过，这款新芯片与之前的高端 HX 型号（如 Ryzen 9 7945HX55瓦起），这可能会给消费者带来一些困惑。有关全新 Zen 5 处理器的所有技术细节，我们已在 详细 CPU 分析文章中进行了总结。以下是关键数据：12 个 Zen 5 CPU 内核（24 个线程），基本时钟频率为 2 GHz，提升时钟频率为 5.1 GHz。此外，现在的 NPU 功能更加强大，可以达到 50 TOPS，这也是满足微软 Copilot+ 标准最低要求（40 TOPS）的原因。

现在来谈谈处理器本身的性能。应该指出的是，Zenbook S 16 内的 HX 370 是一个较弱的版本，功率为 33/28 瓦，但其结果仍然令人印象深刻。与 Ryzen 7 8840HSHP Envy x360 2in1（40/26 瓦）相比，它在多核测试中的性能提高了 20-30%，具体取决于测试内容。英特尔的竞争产品普遍得益于其较高的短期功耗限制，尤其是在基准测试中，但如果考虑到 酷睿至尊 7 155H在 戴尔 XPS 16为例，其多核性能仅提高了 10-12%（但所需功耗也大幅提高，分别为 100 瓦/85 瓦），这的确是一项了不起的工作。

与当前的骁龙 CPU 相比，结果取决于配置。例如 X1E-80-100的直接竞争对手 三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16在多核测试中速度稍慢，但 X1E-78-100内的 华硕 Vivobook S 15在标准模式下速度稍快。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø2407 (2382.65-2498.13) Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100: Ø1662 (1576.29-1694.92) Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2278 (2205.8-2679.71) HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø1951 (1885.73-2044.68) Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2016 (1825.4-2515.57) Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2433 (2259.12-2745.18) Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2707 (2643.06-2817.5) Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2931 (2869.44-3004.58)

在单核性能方面，我们注意到惠普 Envy 的 Ryzen 7 8840HS 比 Ryzen 7 8840HS 提高了 10-19%，具体取决于测试--包括最快的酷睿 Ultra 9 芯片在内的 Meteor Lake 竞争对手也被击败了。它的性能也超过了新的骁龙 X1E-X78-100，但双核提升至 4.0 GHz 的 X1E-80-100 则更胜一筹。

CPU Performance rating: Percent Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance rating

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

88.6 pt Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

86.4 pt Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 -2! Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

81.1 pt Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

78.4 pt Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

76.8 pt Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

74.9 pt Average of class Multimedia

74.2 pt Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 -1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

70.9 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 -2! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

69.9 pt HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr -2! AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

65.1 pt Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

55.4 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 -2! Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

55.2 pt Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

1099 Points +19%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (621 - 1299, n=32)

1083 Points +18%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1001 Points +9%Average of class Multimedia (327 - 2069, n=65, last 2 years)

995 Points +8%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

956 Points +4%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

921 Points Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

895 Points -3%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

866 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

857 Points -7%Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

123 Points +8%Average of class Multimedia (72.5 - 200, n=48, last 2 years)

121.6 Points +7%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (113.6 - 121, n=22)

117 Points +3%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

115.8 Points +2%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

113.6 Points Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

108 Points -5%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

107 Points -6%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

104 Points -8%Cinebench R23 / Multi Core

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

23236 Points +41%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (10435 - 23902, n=31)

20668 Points +25%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

19851 Points +20%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

18433 Points +12%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

17401 Points +5%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

16522 Points Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 33362, n=79, last 2 years)

16136 Points -2%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

15802 (14802min - 15802.2max) Points -4%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

15171 Points -8%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

13082 (12624.7min - 13082.1max) Points -21%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

10856 Points -34%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

9410 Points -43%Cinebench R23 / Single Core

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2035 Points +4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1921 - 2049, n=24)

2012 Points +3%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

1953 Points Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

1906 Points -2%Average of class Multimedia (1128 - 2459, n=71, last 2 years)

1854 Points -5%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1791 Points -8%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1759 Points -10%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1756 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1755 Points -10%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

1745 Points -11%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

1287 Points -34%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

1130 Points -42%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

9057 Points +40%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6449 - 9280, n=23)

8395 Points +30%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

7651 Points +18%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

7146 Points +10%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

6671 Points +3%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

6469 Points Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

6185 Points -4%Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 12912, n=62, last 2 years)

6175 Points -5%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

5865 Points -9%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

4994 Points -23%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

4033 Points -38%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

3555 Points -45%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

803 Points +4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (753 - 804, n=23)

789 Points +2%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

772 Points Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

735 Points -5%Average of class Multimedia (420 - 853, n=62, last 2 years)

697 Points -10%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

672 Points -13%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

670 Points -13%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

667 Points -14%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

667 Points -14%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

649 Points -16%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

480 Points -38%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

420 Points -46%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

3483 (2901.49min - 3483.11max) Points +39%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2498 - 3551, n=23)

3242 Points +30%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

3005 (2869.44min - 3004.58max) Points +20%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2818 (2643.06min - 2817.5max) Points +13%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2745 (2259.12min - 2745.18max) Points +10%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2680 (2205.8min - 2679.71max) Points +7%Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=68, last 2 years)

2541 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2516 (1825.4min - 2515.57max) Points +1%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2498.13 (2382.65min - 2498.13max) Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

2045 (1885.73min - 2044.68max) Points -18%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

1984 (1854.94min - 1984.03max) Points -21%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

1695 (1576.29min - 1694.92max) Points -32%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

306 Points +3%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

298 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (188.8 - 315, n=23)

292 Points -2%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

280 Points -6%Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 326, n=65, last 2 years)

267 Points -10%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

261 Points -12%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

260 Points -13%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

256 Points -14%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

256 Points -14%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

254 Points -15%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

235 Points -21%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

210 Points -30%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

351 Seconds * -83%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

313 Seconds * -63%Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=63, last 2 years)

250 Seconds * -30%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

246 Seconds * -28%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

224 Seconds * -17%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

209 Seconds * -9%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

192 Seconds * Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

190 Seconds * +1%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

179 Seconds * +7%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

163 Seconds * +15%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (139 - 192, n=24)

155.2 Seconds * +19%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

149 Seconds * +22%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

83572 MIPS +24%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (66154 - 84735, n=23)

78634 MIPS +16%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

76331 MIPS +13%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

70074 MIPS +4%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

68254 MIPS +1%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

67615 MIPS Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

63597 MIPS -6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

61091 MIPS -10%Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=61, last 2 years)

59709 MIPS -12%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

54768 MIPS -19%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

44935 MIPS -34%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

43764 MIPS -35%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

6200 MIPS +2%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (5859 - 6497, n=23)

6178 MIPS +2%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

6063 MIPS HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

5912 MIPS -2%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

5781 MIPS -5%Average of class Multimedia (3666 - 7545, n=61, last 2 years)

5738 MIPS -5%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

5496 MIPS -9%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

5486 MIPS -10%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

5474 MIPS -10%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

5374 MIPS -11%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

5242 MIPS -14%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

4611 MIPS -24%Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

15338 Points +12%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11973 - 16311, n=25)

14661 Points +7%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

14646 Points +7%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

14256 Points +4%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

14031 Points +3%Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 25760, n=75, last 2 years)

13718 Points +1%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

13656 Points 0%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

13648 Points Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

13501 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

12422 Points -9%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

12243 Points -10%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

11081 Points -19%Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2780 - 2965, n=25)

2888 Points +4%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2847 Points +2%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2785 Points Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

2751 Points -1%Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 4326, n=71, last 2 years)

2725 Points -2%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

2570 Points -8%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

2525 Points -9%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

2454 Points -12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2440 Points -12%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2418 Points -13%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2414 Points -13%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2356 Points -15%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

14516 Points +16%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11394 - 16322, n=24)

14325 Points +15%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

13936 Points +12%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

13556 Points +9%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

13276 Points +6%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

12487 Points Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

12331 Points -1%Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 20422, n=62, last 2 years)

12267 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

12158 Points -3%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

9949 Points -20%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

9591 Points -23%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1957 - 2175, n=24)

2089 Points +1%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2078 Points Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2028 Points -2%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

1902 Points -8%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

1894 Points -9%Average of class Multimedia (805 - 2974, n=62, last 2 years)

1874 Points -10%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

1805 Points -13%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1801 Points -13%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1775 Points -15%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1764 Points -15%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1760 Points -15%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

26.9 fps +33%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 28.7, n=23)

25.5 fps +26%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

22.7 fps +12%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

20.8 fps +2%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

20.3 fps Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

19.5 fps -4%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

17.9 fps -12%Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 36.1, n=61, last 2 years)

17.8 fps -12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

16.8 fps -17%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

15.7 fps -23%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

7.57 fps -63%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

6.69 fps -67%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

59.7 s * -20%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

58.5 s * -18%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (46.8 - 66.6, n=23)

53.8 s * -8%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

53.6 s * -8%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

51.7 s * -4%Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=62, last 2 years)

50.1 s * -1%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

49.6 s * Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

45.7 s * +8%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

45.6 s * +8%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

44.8 s * +10%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

40.9 s * +18%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

39.7 s * +20%R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

0.756 sec * -78%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

0.647 sec * -52%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

0.4837 sec * -14%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

0.4828 sec * -13%Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=61, last 2 years)

0.4785 sec * -12%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

0.4692 sec * -10%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

0.4688 sec * -10%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

0.4638 sec * -9%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

0.4457 sec * -5%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

0.4257 sec * Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0.3892 - 0.529, n=23)

0.4122 sec * +3%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

0.4075 sec * +4%* ... smaller is better

详细的效率分析可参见我们的 单独的 CPU 文章中但即便如此，我们还是想简单了解一下它在对比组中的效率。在 Cinebench R23 测试中，我们很快发现英特尔机型的性能比新的 Zen 5 处理器差很多，但这只限于多核测试。在单核测试中，英特尔和 AMD 的表现相差无几。我们使用 Cinebench 2024 将其与骁龙芯片进行了比较。正如我们刚才看到的 X1E-80-100内的 三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16性能稍弱，但这对其效率有积极影响，从而领先于 Ryzen 芯片。华硕 华硕 Vivobook S 15的性能稍好，但效率明显较低。即便如此，高通公司的 ARM 芯片在单核测试中的效率还是要高得多。

Power Consumption: Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | Cinebench 2024 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | Cinebench 2024 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

354 Points per Watt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

245 Points per Watt -31%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

231 Points per Watt -35%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

199.2 Points per Watt -44%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

182.6 Points per Watt -48%Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

78.5 Points per Watt +25%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

71.1 Points per Watt +14%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

62.8 Points per Watt 0%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

62.6 Points per Watt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

58.9 Points per Watt -6%Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

22.1 Points per Watt +12%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

19.7 Points per Watt Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

18 Points per Watt -9%Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

7.15 Points per Watt +96%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

6.39 Points per Watt +76%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3.64 Points per Watt

如前所述，这只是与直接竞争对手的比较。如需更广泛的比较和更多的效率测量，请参阅 我们的 Zen 5 CPU 分析。

在连续负载情况下，CPU 的性能几乎保持不变，电池运行情况也是如此。更多 CPU 基准测试 这里.

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit207 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit2498.13 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit298 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit97.9 %

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)6469 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)772 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core16522 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core1953 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core113.6 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core921 Points

Help... in comparison

Performance rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance rating

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

97.2 pt Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

79.7 pt HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

69 pt Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

65.5 pt Average of class Multimedia

65.1 pt Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

63.8 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

61.7 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

39.3 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37804, n=22)

33747 KRay/s +37%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

24673 KRay/s HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

20007 KRay/s -19%Average of class Multimedia (2214 - 50388, n=58, last 2 years)

16915 KRay/s -31%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

14281 KRay/s -42%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

14272 KRay/s -42%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

13431 KRay/s -46%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

6583 KRay/s -73%AIDA64 / FPU Julia

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (95655 - 148045, n=23)

130636 Points +35%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

97073 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

84591 Points -13%Average of class Multimedia (12867 - 201874, n=59, last 2 years)

79709 Points -18%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

77094 Points -21%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

75538 Points -22%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

68747 Points -29%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

19477 Points -80%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5932, n=23)

5432 MB/s +23%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

4421 MB/s HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

3847 MB/s -13%Average of class Multimedia (653 - 8623, n=59, last 2 years)

3691 MB/s -17%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

3545 MB/s -20%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

3480 MB/s -21%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

3320 MB/s -25%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

2893 MB/s -35%AIDA64 / CPU Queen

HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

107640 Points +27%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

89661 Points +6%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

88106 Points +4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (41744 - 99232, n=23)

86251 Points +2%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

84460 Points Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

83844 Points -1%Average of class Multimedia (13483 - 181505, n=59, last 2 years)

79509 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

68857 Points -18%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19120, n=23)

18425 Points +12%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

16445 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

12929 Points -21%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

10066 Points -39%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

10012 Points -39%Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=59, last 2 years)

9710 Points -41%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

9521 Points -42%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

1664 Points -90%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (50357 - 93798, n=22)

69968 Points +36%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

51277 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

44969 Points -12%Average of class Multimedia (6395 - 105740, n=58, last 2 years)

40154 Points -22%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

37438 Points -27%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

36925 Points -28%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

34153 Points -33%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

15344 Points -70%AIDA64 / CPU AES

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (67015 - 118993, n=23)

86551 MB/s +27%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

74058 MB/s +9%Average of class Multimedia (13243 - 169946, n=59, last 2 years)

72222 MB/s +6%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

72068 MB/s +6%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

70892 MB/s +4%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

69000 MB/s +1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

68954 MB/s +1%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

68042 MB/s AIDA64 / CPU ZLib

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1077 - 1530, n=23)

1402 MB/s +29%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

1086 MB/s Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

1041 MB/s -4%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

1018 MB/s -6%Average of class Multimedia (167.2 - 2022, n=59, last 2 years)

977 MB/s -10%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

966 MB/s -11%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

857 MB/s -21%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

617 MB/s -43%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13665 - 20648, n=23)

18315 KRay/s +31%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

13959 KRay/s HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

10571 KRay/s -24%Average of class Multimedia (1014 - 26875, n=59, last 2 years)

9237 KRay/s -34%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

7640 KRay/s -45%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

7584 KRay/s -46%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

6970 KRay/s -50%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

3794 KRay/s -73%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

52218 MPixel/s +6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

51338 MPixel/s +4%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

49404 MPixel/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (36752 - 51727, n=23)

48165 MPixel/s -3%Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 65787, n=59, last 2 years)

43986 MPixel/s -11%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

43340 MPixel/s -12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

34213 MPixel/s -31%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

31491 MPixel/s -36%

系统性能全新的 Zenbook S 16 在合成基准测试中表现出色，只是在浏览器测试中不得不承认输给了全新的 Snapdragon CPU。总的来说，Zenbook 在日常使用中是一个反应超级灵敏的系统，但我们在测试中还是遇到了一些驱动程序问题。例如，我们的 LatencyMon 版本无法正常工作，游戏F1 24 也多次出现蓝屏。不过，由于我们使用 Zen 5 的三台测试设备都出现了这种情况，我们可以认为驱动程序问题是造成这种情况的根本原因，制造商肯定会解决这个问题。我们已经就这个问题与 AMD 联系。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total PCMark 10 / Score

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

7487 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (6577 - 7735, n=13)

7353 Points -2%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB

7037 Points -6%Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 10386, n=55, last 2 years)

7005 Points -6%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

6994 Points -7%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

6958 Points -7%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

6713 Points -10%PCMark 10 / Essentials

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

11079 Points +1%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB

11076 Points +1%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

10964 Points 0%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

10918 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

10503 Points -4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9277 - 11262, n=13)

10470 Points -4%Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 12420, n=55, last 2 years)

10455 Points -4%PCMark 10 / Productivity

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

10615 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

9933 Points -6%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (8497 - 10615, n=13)

9814 Points -8%Average of class Multimedia (7323 - 16647, n=55, last 2 years)

9382 Points -12%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB

8791 Points -17%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

8470 Points -20%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

8343 Points -21%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9334 - 11422, n=13)

10522 Points +7%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

9999 Points +2%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

9828 Points Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 16240, n=55, last 2 years)

9749 Points -1%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB

9712 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

8885 Points -10%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

8763 Points -11%CrossMark / Overall

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

1771 Points +1%Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2426, n=63, last 2 years)

1764 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1751 Points 0%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1749 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1344 - 2040, n=12)

1719 Points -2%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB

1707 Points -2%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

1643 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

1384 Points -21%CrossMark / Productivity

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

1704 Points +5%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1685 Points +4%Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2344, n=63, last 2 years)

1669 Points +3%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB

1628 Points 0%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1625 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

1611 Points -1%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1166 - 1833, n=12)

1577 Points -3%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

1293 Points -20%CrossMark / Creativity

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2029 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1672 - 2439, n=12)

2013 Points -1%Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2820, n=63, last 2 years)

1996 Points -2%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

1916 Points -6%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB

1913 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1911 Points -6%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

1790 Points -12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

1537 Points -24%CrossMark / Responsiveness

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

1572 Points +12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1514 Points +8%Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=63, last 2 years)

1450 Points +4%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1398 Points Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB

1397 Points 0%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1067 - 1645, n=12)

1395 Points 0%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

1347 Points -4%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

1237 Points -12%WebXPRT 3 / Overall

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

454 Points +41%Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=66, last 2 years)

323 Points +1%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

321 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (252 - 363, n=12)

308 Points -4%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

297 Points -7%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB

285 Points -11%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

279 Points -13%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

275 Points -14%WebXPRT 4 / Overall

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

311 Points +17%Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 384, n=65, last 2 years)

278 Points +5%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

266 Points Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB

258 Points -3%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

257 Points -3%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

252 Points -5%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (210 - 277, n=13)

248 Points -7%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

246 Points -8%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total

HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

538 ms * -23%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB

529 ms * -21%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

528 ms * -20%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

528 ms * -20%Average of class Multimedia (228 - 835, n=69, last 2 years)

476 ms * -8%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

439 ms * Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (308 - 503, n=14)

436 ms * +1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

422.3 ms * +4%* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score

7487 pointsHelp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

93443 MB/s +4%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

91209 MB/s +1%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

90221 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (72702 - 93640, n=23)

84876 MB/s -6%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

78983 MB/s -12%Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 109252, n=59, last 2 years)

76498 MB/s -15%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

68720 MB/s -24%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

63495 MB/s -30%AIDA64 / Memory Read

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

125604 MB/s +24%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

100903 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84635 - 102937, n=23)

95403 MB/s -5%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

90142 MB/s -11%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

85824 MB/s -15%Average of class Multimedia (19699 - 125604, n=59, last 2 years)

77950 MB/s -23%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

73509 MB/s -27%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

50273 MB/s -50%AIDA64 / Memory Write

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

100401 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (80685 - 108954, n=23)

95825 MB/s -5%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

91050 MB/s -9%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

76048 MB/s -24%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

75823 MB/s -24%Average of class Multimedia (17733 - 117933, n=59, last 2 years)

74026 MB/s -26%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

69181 MB/s -31%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

45265 MB/s -55%AIDA64 / Memory Latency

Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

143.9 ns * -28%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

139.9 ns * -24%Average of class Multimedia (7 - 535, n=59, last 2 years)

127.5 ns * -13%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

125.8 ns * -12%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

121.8 ns * -8%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

112.4 ns * Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (86.7 - 119.4, n=23)

101.5 ns * +10%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

8.8 ns * +92%* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟如前所述，我们无法在测试设备上运行 LatencyMon。不过，至少在播放 4K 视频（YouTube）时没有出现丢帧问题。

存储设备我们的测试设备安装了 1TB 版本的美光 2400，首次启动后仍有 895 GB 可用。这款 M.2 2280 格式的 PCIe 4.0 SSD 可提供高达 5 GB/s 的良好传输速率，即使在持续负载的情况下也能保持稳定。虽然市场上还有更快的硬盘，但它的性能完全够用。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFMCDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:

5069 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:

3355 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:

429 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:

413 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K:

41.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K:

82.9 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:

171.9 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:

361 MB/s

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFMSequential Read:

3882MB/s

Sequential Write:

2500MB/s

4K Read:

32.4MB/s

4K Write:

181.5MB/s

4K-64 Read:

431MB/s

4K-64 Write:

1388MB/s

Access Time Read:

0.025ms

Access Time Write:

0.13ms

Copy ISO:

2762.75MB/s

Copy Program:

1050.07MB/s

Copy Game:

2551.52MB/s

Score Read:

852Points

Score Write:

1820Points

Score Total:

3044Points

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFMDiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:

5048MB/s

DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:

3597MB/s

DiskSpd seq_read:

2411MB/s

DiskSpd seq_write:

2768MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:

521MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:

295MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:

33.5MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:

140.9MB/s

DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:

4987MB/s

Drive Performance rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance rating - Percent

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

84.3 pt Average of class Multimedia

83.9 pt Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

76.4 pt Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

75.7 pt Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

72.2 pt Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

61.4 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

55.5 pt HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

53.3 pt DiskSpd

seq readAverage of class Multimedia (453 - 4553, n=62, last 2 years)

2861 MB/s +19%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

2772 (2598.84min - 2771.51max) MB/s +15%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

2652 (2626.88min - 2652.48max) MB/s +10%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2411 (2392.64min - 2410.68max) MB/s HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

2381 (2369.66min - 2380.54max) MB/s -1%Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (1870 - 2660, n=20)

2263 MB/s -6%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

2254 (2201.38min - 2254.23max) MB/s -7%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

2188 (2167.89min - 2188.41max) MB/s -9% seq writeDell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

3150 (2866.18min - 3149.7max) MB/s +14%Average of class Multimedia (384 - 5711, n=62, last 2 years)

3086 MB/s +11%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2768 (2672.71min - 2768.03max) MB/s Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (2052 - 3141, n=20)

2627 MB/s -5%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

2330 (2272.26min - 2329.73max) MB/s -16%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

2328 (2307.7min - 2328.26max) MB/s -16%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

2320 (2187.12min - 2319.66max) MB/s -16%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

557 (554.49min - 557max) MB/s -80% seq q8 t1 readAverage of class Multimedia (467 - 7126, n=62, last 2 years)

5261 MB/s +4%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

5199 (4613.53min - 5199.14max) MB/s +3%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

5048 (4430.92min - 5048.23max) MB/s Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (4129 - 5093, n=20)

4676 MB/s -7%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

3727 (3040.66min - 3726.94max) MB/s -26%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

3562 (3054.5min - 3562.01max) MB/s -29%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

3331 (2575.51min - 3331.12max) MB/s -34%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

2723 (2395.19min - 2722.52max) MB/s -46% seq q8 t1 writeDell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

4537 (4423.9min - 4536.71max) MB/s +26%Average of class Multimedia (247 - 6898, n=62, last 2 years)

4150 MB/s +15%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3597 (3491.97min - 3597.45max) MB/s Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (2461 - 3635, n=20)

3296 MB/s -8%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

2939 (2905.25min - 2938.94max) MB/s -18%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

2409 (2377.61min - 2408.59max) MB/s -33%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

2344 (1404.04min - 2343.99max) MB/s -35%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

555 (553.17min - 554.85max) MB/s -85% 4k q1 t1 readSamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

80.8 (80.01min - 80.76max) MB/s +141%Average of class Multimedia (18.8 - 97.7, n=62, last 2 years)

60.9 MB/s +82%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

60 (58.96min - 60.01max) MB/s +79%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

54.8 (51.93min - 54.84max) MB/s +64%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

52.5 (51.53min - 52.46max) MB/s +57%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

40.3 (38.77min - 40.27max) MB/s +20%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

33.5 (33.26min - 33.51max) MB/s Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (14.6 - 40.3, n=20)

33.5 MB/s 0% 4k q1 t1 writeXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

193 (186.4min - 192.95max) MB/s +37%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

190.9 (186.79min - 190.93max) MB/s +35%Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (75.9 - 286, n=20)

176.2 MB/s +25%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

167.7 (152.89min - 167.68max) MB/s +19%Average of class Multimedia (40.3 - 378, n=62, last 2 years)

158.1 MB/s +12%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

141.2 (137.96min - 141.21max) MB/s 0%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

140.9 (133.2min - 140.87max) MB/s HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

136.5 (133.54min - 136.47max) MB/s -3% 4k q32 t16 readSamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1821 (1804.4min - 1821.4max) MB/s +250%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

1684 (1639.23min - 1684.06max) MB/s +223%Average of class Multimedia (190.3 - 4881, n=62, last 2 years)

1332 MB/s +156%Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (283 - 2850, n=20)

1148 MB/s +120%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

859 (846.09min - 858.76max) MB/s +65%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

588 (581.91min - 587.83max) MB/s +13%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

569 (553.78min - 569.31max) MB/s +9%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

521 (508.25min - 520.66max) MB/s 4k q32 t16 writeSamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1643 (1597.74min - 1643.45max) MB/s +457%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

1142 (1093.19min - 1142.3max) MB/s +287%Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (222 - 2635, n=20)

988 MB/s +235%Average of class Multimedia (154.9 - 3628, n=62, last 2 years)

980 MB/s +232%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

384 (367.4min - 383.87max) MB/s +30%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

377 (370.57min - 377.49max) MB/s +28%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

373 (367.24min - 373.12max) MB/s +26%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

295 (292.32min - 295.22max) MB/s AS SSD

Score TotalAverage of class Multimedia (482 - 9251, n=59, last 2 years)

4864 Points +60%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

4643 Points +53%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

4613 Points +52%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

4369 Points +44%Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (2404 - 6406, n=20)

4257 Points +40%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3044 Points Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

2761 Points -9%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

2449 Points -20% Score ReadSamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1795 Points +111%Average of class Multimedia (192 - 3547, n=59, last 2 years)

1546 Points +81%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

1511 Points +77%Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (787 - 2482, n=20)

1499 Points +76%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

1256 Points +47%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

1151 Points +35%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

955 Points +12%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

852 Points Score WriteDell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

2763 Points +52%Average of class Multimedia (191 - 4521, n=59, last 2 years)

2582 Points +42%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

2107 Points +16%Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (1086 - 2796, n=20)

2049 Points +13%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1962 Points +8%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1820 Points Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

1334 Points -27%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

738 Points -59% Seq ReadAverage of class Multimedia (484 - 5730, n=59, last 2 years)

4235 MB/s +9%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

4076.04 MB/s +5%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3882 MB/s Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (3616 - 4177, n=20)

3850 MB/s -1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

3264 MB/s -16%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

3252 MB/s -16%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

3189 MB/s -18%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

2597 MB/s -33% Seq WriteAverage of class Multimedia (344 - 5698, n=59, last 2 years)

2907 MB/s +16%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

2810.56 MB/s +12%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

2714 MB/s +9%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

2654 MB/s +6%Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (1946 - 3240, n=20)

2569 MB/s +3%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2500 MB/s Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

2260 MB/s -10%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

1738.71 MB/s -30% 4K ReadSamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

69.8 MB/s +115%Average of class Multimedia (17.5 - 97.4, n=59, last 2 years)

60.1 MB/s +85%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

59.26 MB/s +83%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

52.79 MB/s +63%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

51.5 MB/s +59%Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (27.8 - 58.8, n=20)

48.6 MB/s +50%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

46.9 MB/s +45%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

32.4 MB/s 4K WriteAverage Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (135.6 - 288, n=20)

202 MB/s +11%Average of class Multimedia (43.1 - 328, n=59, last 2 years)

185.4 MB/s +2%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

182.5 MB/s +1%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

181.5 MB/s Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

176.9 MB/s -3%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

168.8 MB/s -7%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

156.53 MB/s -14%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

143.4 MB/s -21% 4K-64 ReadSamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1407 MB/s +226%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

1138 MB/s +164%Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (349 - 2005, n=20)

1065 MB/s +147%Average of class Multimedia (125.7 - 2906, n=59, last 2 years)

1062 MB/s +146%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

838.9 MB/s +95%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

788.91 MB/s +83%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

577 MB/s +34%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

431 MB/s 4K-64 WriteDell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

2304.92 MB/s +66%Average of class Multimedia (75.2 - 3969, n=59, last 2 years)

2105 MB/s +52%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

1653 MB/s +19%Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (669 - 2255, n=20)

1592 MB/s +15%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1567 MB/s +13%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1388 MB/s Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

925 MB/s -33%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

407.67 MB/s -71% Access Time ReadHP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

0.109 ms * -336%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

0.092 ms * -268%Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (0.021 - 0.13, n=20)

0.06255 ms * -150%Average of class Multimedia (0.019 - 0.168, n=59, last 2 years)

0.052 ms * -108%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

0.041 ms * -64%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

0.033 ms * -32%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

0.025 ms * Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

0.022 ms * +12% Access Time WriteAsus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

0.13 ms * Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (0.091 - 0.297, n=20)

0.1172 ms * +10%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

0.101 ms * +22%Average of class Multimedia (0.014 - 0.754, n=59, last 2 years)

0.07978 ms * +39%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02

0.078 ms * +40%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Micron 2550 1TB

0.063 ms * +52%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

0.032 ms * +75%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01

0.028 ms * +78%* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4987 (4559-5054.72)

显卡 - Radeon 890MGPU-Z AMD Radeon 890MZen 5 处理器还配备了新的 Radeon 890M(RDNA 3.5) iGPU。与旧版 Radeon 780M(RDNA 3)相比，其 CU 核心数量从 12 个增至 16 个，最高时钟频率从 2.8 GHz 增至 2.9 GHz。有关更多技术细节，请参阅 我们的分析文章。

在基准测试中，我们普遍发现 AMD 已经成功缩小了与Intel Arc Graphics （8 Xe 内核）的差距。不过，由于功耗限制相对较低，Zenbook S 16 并没有充分展示出新 Radeon 890M 的潜力，这就是为什么我们也将ProArt PX13 在 iGPU 模式下的结果纳入对比。Zenbook S 16 使用更快的 LPDDR5x-7500 内存--与当前的ROG Ally X 相同。在合成测试中，Ally X 的 Radeon 780M 有时甚至更快（在涡轮增压模式下，其功耗在最初几分钟也更高），但在单项测试中差距最多只有 8%。不过，在HP Envy （配备 LPDDR5-6400 内存）中，780M 在所有基准测试中的领先优势达到了 27%。在所有测试中，它都明显优于两个骁龙 X Elite GPU 中速度较慢的一个（Adreno X1-85 ，3.8 TFLOPS）（我们尚未测试速度更快的 4.5 TFLOPS 版本，但理论上应该也能击败它）。

GPU 的性能在长期负载和电池工作状态下保持不变。更多 GPU 基准测试，请访问技术版块。

3DMark Performance rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 6.5 3DMark Performance rating - Percent

Average of class Multimedia

95.9 pt Average AMD Radeon 890M

73.3 pt Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 -2! AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

68.4 pt Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

67.8 pt Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

66.3 pt Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

64 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

64 pt Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

62.8 pt HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

52.1 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

39.8 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU

Average of class Multimedia (3765 - 60002, n=58, last 2 years)

20411 Points +53%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

15948 Points +20%Average AMD Radeon 890M (12641 - 17483, n=21)

15044 Points +13%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

13828 Points +4%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

13381 Points 0%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

13345 Points Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

12670 Points -5%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

12413 Points -7%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

12099 Points -9%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

6515 Points -51%3DMark

1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Multimedia (2328 - 48907, n=63, last 2 years)

14644 Points +79%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

9650 Points +18%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

9622 Points +18%Average AMD Radeon 890M (7999 - 10037, n=21)

9037 Points +10%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

8886 Points +9%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

8775 Points +7%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

8567 Points +5%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

8188 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

7357 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

6414 Points -22%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAverage of class Multimedia (696 - 19403, n=64, last 2 years)

5632 Points +65%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

3656 Points +7%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

3451 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

3426 Points 0%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

3421 Points Average AMD Radeon 890M (2942 - 3676, n=22)

3372 Points -1%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

3196 Points -7%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

3023 Points -12%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

2591 Points -24%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

1739 Points -49%Geekbench 6.5

GPU OpenCLAverage of class Multimedia (9994 - 187922, n=69, last 2 years)

54030 Points +58%Average AMD Radeon 890M (26531 - 43082, n=21)

38591 Points +13%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

35855 Points +5%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

35156 Points +3%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

35154 Points +3%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

34259 Points Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

31772 Points -7%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

23247 Points -32%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

20783 Points -39% GPU VulkanAverage AMD Radeon 890M (35560 - 50886, n=21)

44424 Points +16%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

38270 Points Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

35745 Points -7%Average of class Multimedia (7760 - 118336, n=61, last 2 years)

35215 Points -8%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

33886 Points -11%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

32858 Points -14%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

31404 Points -18%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

26767 Points -30%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

24011 Points -37%

3DMark 11 Performance

13042 points3DMark Fire Strike Score

7644 points3DMark Time Spy Score

3768 points3DMark Steel Nomad Score

557 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score

3198 pointsHelp... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU

Average of class Multimedia (160 - 1042, n=64, last 2 years)

421 Seconds * -38%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

412 Seconds * -35%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

405 Seconds * -32%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

367 Seconds * -20%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

344 Seconds * -12%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

306 Seconds * Average AMD Radeon 890M (214 - 475, n=20)

271 Seconds * +11%Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel

Average of class Multimedia (169 - 401, n=10, last 2 years)

250 Seconds * Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

219 Seconds * * ... smaller is better

游戏性能如果不能将笔记本的性能用于游戏，合成结果就没有什么意义了。在运行我们选择的标准游戏时，Zenbook S 16 内的 Radeon 890M 仅次于速度更快的 英特尔弧形显卡和惠普 Envy 中的旧版 Radeon 780M 相比领先约 10%。 ROG Ally X在涡轮增压模式下速度更快。ProArt PX13 的 Radeon 890M 无节流版又快了 11%。

Performance rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 Performance rating - Percent

Average of class Multimedia

100 pt Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

63.1 pt Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

61.4 pt Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 -1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

60.9 pt Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

56.8 pt Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

56.7 pt HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr -1! AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

54.6 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

51.7 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 -2! Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

42.7 pt The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)

Average of class Multimedia (11 - 121, n=28, last 2 years)

49.2 fps +59%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

34 fps +10%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

31.1 fps 0%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

31 fps HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

28.8 (24min) fps -7%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

25.1 (23min, 24P1) fps -19%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

23.9 (23min) fps -23%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

23.1 (12min, 21P1) fps -25%GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x

Average of class Multimedia (9.51 - 141.6, n=59, last 2 years)

53.9 fps +77%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

31.6 (2.04min, 22.7P1) fps +4%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

30.4 (3.23min, 21.7P1) fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

27.1 (7.11min, 18.9P1) fps -11%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

21.5 (2.75min, 12.5P1) fps -29%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

15.9 (2.93min, 11.4P1) fps -48%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

14.3 (1.247min, 7.75P1) fps -53%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality

Average of class Multimedia (7.61 - 144.4, n=64, last 2 years)

52.3 fps +83%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

33.2 fps +16%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

30.6 fps +7%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

30 fps +5%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

28.6 fps Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

26.8 fps -6%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

25.2 fps -12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

24.4 fps -15%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

15.9 fps -44%Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16

Average of class Multimedia (13.3 - 303, n=64, last 2 years)

92.4 fps +86%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

55.7 (36min, 42.8P1) fps +12%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

53 fps +6%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

51.6 (35.6min, 40.1P1) fps +4%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

49.8 (31.1min, 37.7P1) fps Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

47 fps -6%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

45.4 (5min, 8.91P1) fps -9%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

42.2 (7.1min, 9.18P1) fps -15%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

38 fps -24%Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking

Average of class Multimedia (29 - 179.9, n=66, last 2 years)

89.5 fps +170%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

79.8 (51.5min) fps +141%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

78 (52.7min) fps +136%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

76.2 (68.4min) fps +130%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

73.6 (51.1min) fps +122%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

65.4 (54.7min) fps +98%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

53 (39.7min) fps +60%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

36 (20.4min) fps +9%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

33.1 (18.7min) fps X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)

Average of class Multimedia (16.9 - 141.1, n=61, last 2 years)

58.7 fps +33%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

51.1 fps +16%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

44.2 fps Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

40.1 fps -9%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

33.5 fps -24%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

33.2 fps -25%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

32.4 fps -27%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

27.9 fps -37%

我们又测试了一些游戏，发现英特尔 Arc Graphics 图形处理器普遍领先。不过，Zenbook S 16 与 ROG Ally X（功耗限制略高）轮番上阵。总体而言，性能确实有所提升，但 Radeon 890M 需要更多的电力才能充分发挥其潜力。

在我们的赛博朋克连续测试中，几分钟后就出现了几次 FPS 下降。幸好随后性能又趋于稳定。你很快就会发现，在压力测试中也出现了这种情况，因此我们可以认为这是 Zenbook S 16 的配置问题。

Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | Far Cry 5 | F1 23 Cyberpunk 2077

1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)Average of class Multimedia (4.66 - 149.5, n=74, last 2 years)

61.5 fps +34%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

51.5 (42.9min) fps +12%Average AMD Radeon 890M (28.8 - 52.5, n=26)

46.4 fps +1%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

46 (38.3min) fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

44.1 (37.1min) fps -4%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

35.5 (19.3min) fps -23%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

34.7 (25.8min) fps -25%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

31 (25.4min) fps -33%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

27.6 (20.7min) fps -40%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

24.4 (19.1min) fps -47%1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)Average of class Multimedia (9.42 - 129, n=65, last 2 years)

54.4 fps +74%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

40.7 (34.2min) fps +30%Average AMD Radeon 890M (22.3 - 40.9, n=25)

36.6 fps +17%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

34.3 (30min) fps +10%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

31.3 (19.7min) fps Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

29.5 (22.4min) fps -6%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

27.8 (15.3min) fps -11%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

26.3 (20.8min) fps -16%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

25.4 (20.9min) fps -19%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

19.5 (15.7min) fps -38%1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)Average of class Multimedia (6.67 - 120.3, n=70, last 2 years)

44.3 fps +74%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

31.6 (26.6min) fps +24%Average AMD Radeon 890M (18.4 - 32.3, n=25)

28.6 fps +13%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

27.2 (23.2min) fps +7%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

25.4 (15.6min) fps Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

25 (16.7min) fps -2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

22.8 (19.1min) fps -10%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

22.1 (11min) fps -13%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

21.9 (16.8min) fps -14%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

17 (13.4min) fps -33%1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)Average of class Multimedia (6.41 - 112.3, n=71, last 2 years)

38.9 fps +68%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

27.8 (23.1min) fps +20%Average AMD Radeon 890M (15.5 - 28.4, n=26)

25.1 fps +9%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

23.1 (18.2min) fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

22.9 (19.3min) fps -1%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

21.2 (12.2min) fps -8%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

20.7 (15.8min) fps -10%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

19.1 (9.74min) fps -17%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

14.9 (11.6min) fps -35%Baldur's Gate 3

1920x1080 Low Preset AA:SMAverage of class Multimedia (12.2 - 173.6, n=55, last 2 years)

74.2 fps +64%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

45.2 fps Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

44.5 fps -2%Average AMD Radeon 890M (26.8 - 50, n=26)

43.6 fps -4%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

41.1 fps -9%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

35 fps -23%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

30.8 fps -32%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

25.1 fps -44%1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:TAverage of class Multimedia (10.2 - 143.6, n=56, last 2 years)

60.4 fps +69%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

36.4 fps +2%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

35.8 fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (21.3 - 39.8, n=26)

34.6 fps -3%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

32.1 fps -10%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

28.5 fps -20%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

27.4 fps -23%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

20.6 fps -42%1920x1080 High Preset AA:TAverage of class Multimedia (8.2 - 129.3, n=56, last 2 years)

50.3 fps +96%Average AMD Radeon 890M (18.8 - 33.2, n=26)

28.9 fps +13%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

28.5 fps +11%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

26.6 fps +4%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

25.6 fps Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

23.7 fps -7%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

22.6 fps -12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

18 fps -30%1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:TAverage of class Multimedia (7.8 - 158.7, n=59, last 2 years)

49.4 fps +98%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

29.1 fps +17%Average AMD Radeon 890M (18.6 - 32.5, n=25)

27.9 fps +12%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

25.8 fps +4%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

24.9 fps HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

22.2 fps -11%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

22 fps -12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

17.4 fps -30%Far Cry 5

1280x720 Low Preset AA:TAverage of class Multimedia (37 - 182, n=34, last 2 years)

100.1 fps +24%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

98 fps +21%Average AMD Radeon 890M (75 - 101, n=11)

91.5 fps +13%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

84 fps +4%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

81 fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

78 fps -4%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

68 (21min) fps -16%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

67 fps -17%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

63 (46min) fps -22%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

37 fps -54%1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:TAverage of class Multimedia (21 - 161, n=35, last 2 years)

74.1 fps +48%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

59 fps +18%Average AMD Radeon 890M (42 - 60, n=11)

54.5 fps +9%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

52 fps +4%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

50 fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

46 fps -8%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

39 fps -22%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

38 (12min) fps -24%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

36 (6min) fps -28%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

30 fps -40%1920x1080 High Preset AA:TAverage of class Multimedia (19 - 150, n=36, last 2 years)

68.3 fps +48%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

54 fps +17%Average AMD Radeon 890M (39 - 55, n=11)

50.5 fps +10%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

48 fps +4%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

46 fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

42 fps -9%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

38 fps -17%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

36 (24min) fps -22%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

33 (20min) fps -28%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

28 fps -39%1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:TAverage of class Multimedia (17 - 145, n=36, last 2 years)

63.7 fps +93%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

51 fps +55%Average AMD Radeon 890M (33 - 52, n=11)

46.8 fps +42%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

45 fps +36%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

40 fps +21%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

35 fps +6%Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

34 (28min) fps +3%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

33 fps HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

31 (23min) fps -6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

27 fps -18%F1 23

1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16xAsus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

106.3 (88min, 67P1) fps +46%Average of class Multimedia (10.6 - 229, n=21, last 2 years)

95.3 fps +31%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

89.6 (77min, 73P1) fps +23%Average AMD Radeon 890M (72.8 - 106.3, n=3)

89.1 fps +22%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

80.1 (63min, 65P1) fps +10%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

72.8 (52min, 37P1) fps Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

70.9 (47min, 49P1) fps -3%1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16xAsus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

96.5 (83min, 66P1) fps +39%Average of class Multimedia (9.61 - 239, n=21, last 2 years)

90.4 fps +30%Average AMD Radeon 890M (69.3 - 96.5, n=3)

80.7 fps +16%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

79 (69min, 64P1) fps +14%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

74.2 (49min, 62P1) fps +7%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

69.3 (57min, 31P1) fps Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

62.9 (32min, 47P1) fps -9%1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16xAverage of class Multimedia (6.53 - 209, n=22, last 2 years)

75 fps +35%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

70.3 (56min, 45P1) fps +26%Average AMD Radeon 890M (55.6 - 70.3, n=3)

61.5 fps +11%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

56.6 (49min, 47P1) fps +2%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

55.6 (40min, 26P1) fps Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

50.4 (41min, 43P1) fps -9%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

44.8 (37min, 36P1) fps -19%1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16xAverage of class Multimedia (11 - 70.3, n=16, last 2 years)

28.9 fps +135%Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

17 (11min, 11P1) fps +38%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

14 (10min, 10P1) fps +14%Average AMD Radeon 890M (12.1 - 17, n=3)

13.8 fps +12%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

13 (6min, 8P1) fps +6%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

12.3 (7min, 7P1) fps

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M: Ø19.5 (13.6-21.2)

lowmed.highultraGTA V (2015)

161.3

129.6

68.4

30.4

The Witcher 3 (2015)

155

52

31

Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

161.1

123.1

35.8

33.1

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)

75.5

38.3

28.6

X-Plane 11.11 (2018)

66.5

54.4

44.2

Far Cry 5 (2018)

81

50

46

33

Strange Brigade (2018)

165.1

71.1

60.2

49.8

F1 22 (2022)

81

76.8

64.2

16.7

F1 23 (2023)

72.8

69.3

55.6

12.3

Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)

45.2

35.8

25.6

24.9

Cyberpunk 2077 (2023)

46

31.3

25.4

23.1

Total War Pharaoh (2023)

90.3

67.9

50.7

42.2

Ghost of Tsushima (2024)

34.6

28

19.4

18.7

排放 - 安静的伙伴噪音排放带两个小风扇的冷却装置在日常使用中，Zenbook S 16 是一个非常安静的伙伴，它比采用 AMD 和英特尔芯片的竞争对手安静得多。与 三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16骁龙处理器相比，它的两个风扇在负载情况下声音会稍大一些，而且启动得也更快一些。在这方面，ARM 处理器显然更具优势。Zenbook S 16 的两种可选性能模式的噪音为 46 dB(A)，比标准模式大很多，就其低性能优势而言，这实在是太大了。而在耳语模式下，我们注意到最大音量为 28.9 dB(A)，几乎听不到。测试设备也没有发出额外的电子噪音。

Noise level

Idle

24.7 / 24.7 / 26.4 dB(A)Load

35.7 / 36.8 dB(A)

30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud

min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A)

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFMSamsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TBHP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLUXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TBNoise7%-6%8%-4%2%off / environment * (dB)24.724.6 -0%22.9 7%22.9 7%24.6 -0%24.4 1%Idle Minimum * (dB)24.724.6 -0%22.9 7%23 7%24.6 -0%24.4 1%Idle Average * (dB)24.724.6 -0%22.9 7%23 7%24.6 -0%24.4 1%Idle Maximum * (dB)26.424.6 7%25 5%23 13%26.4 -0%24.4 8%Load Average * (dB)35.728.1 21%45.1 -26%23.8 33%40 -12%32 10%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)36.832.4 12%44.9 -22%Load Maximum * (dB)36.832.4 12%44.9 -22%43.8 -19%40 -9%39.7 -8%Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)43.84030.6* ... smaller is better

温度薄薄的底座让笔记本电脑的表面温度一目了然，在空闲模式下，我们已经在很多地方测得了 29-30°C 的温度。当然，这并不是关键因素，但它确实能让你知道笔记本电脑在负载情况下会出现什么问题。在游戏和压力测试时，我们注意到设备底部的一个位置温度超过 50 °C，总的来说，温度相当高。在这种情况下，使用过程中不应将笔记本电脑放在大腿上。键盘区域也会明显发热，但您仍然可以不受任何限制地打字。不过，无论如何，您在执行高要求任务时都不会遇到这样的问题。即便如此，小巧的电源装置在负载情况下也会变得过热，温度最高可达 60 °C。

在压力测试中，它的时钟频率和温度在最初几分钟就出现了波动。在大约 15 分钟的时间里，该设备的功耗值一直保持在 28 瓦左右，最后才稳定在 22-23 瓦左右。不过，华硕应该会通过即将推出的更新来稳定这方面的性能。

CPU/iGPU 数据压力测试

Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

44.3 °C46.9 °C44.2 °C 40 °C44.1 °C39.6 °C 32.4 °C31.3 °C32.5 °C

Maximum: 46.9 °CAverage: 39.5 °C

48.9 °C53.5 °C49.5 °C42.2 °C44.9 °C42.1 °C34.2 °C34.9 °C34.2 °C

Maximum: 53.5 °CAverage: 42.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 60.5 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

29.2 °C29.5 °C29 °C 28.4 °C28.6 °C28.1 °C 27.1 °C26.9 °C27 °C

Maximum: 29.5 °CAverage: 28.2 °C

29.3 °C30.2 °C29.9 °C28.2 °C29.2 °C28.9 °C27.3 °C27.4 °C27.8 °C

Maximum: 30.2 °CAverage: 28.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 35 °C | Room Temperature 22.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

44.1 °C46.1 °C44.2 °C 38.9 °C43.6 °C36.5 °C 31.9 °C30.9 °C32.7 °C

Maximum: 46.1 °CAverage: 38.8 °C

48.6 °C53.4 °C49 °C41.8 °C47.4 °C42.9 °C34.8 °C35.4 °C35.2 °C

Maximum: 53.4 °CAverage: 43.2 °C Power Supply (max.) 58.5 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.5 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.7 °C / 90.9 F) and are therefore not hot. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).

表面温度应力测试（顶部）

表面温度应力测试（底部）

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890MSamsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSDell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPUHP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780MSamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPUXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPUHeat10%1%9%17%12%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)46.944.3 6%46.8 -0%42.6 9%40.9 13%40.3 14%Maximum Bottom * (°C)53.551.6 4%45.6 15%47.8 11%42.6 20%45.9 14%Idle Upper Side * (°C)29.525.1 15%32.2 -9%27.4 7%24.5 17%26.3 11%Idle Bottom * (°C)30.225.8 15%31.4 -4%27.8 8%24.8 18%27.9 8%* ... smaller is better

发言人华硕为 Zenbook S 16 共配备了六个扬声器，效果非常好，笔记本电脑的音量和空间感都很强。三星的 Galaxy Book4 Edge 16在这方面还跟不上，而惠普 惠普 Envy x360则略胜一筹。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 77% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median(+) | highs are linear (1.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (6.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%Compared to all devices tested» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 良好的耐力耗电量65 瓦的紧凑型电源温度很高。在空闲测量中，新款 Zenbook S 16 的表现仅次于三星Galaxy Book4 16 的两个版本。不过，在负载情况下，它的性能要优于所有采用 AMD/Intel CPU 的竞争对手，这也得益于它相对较低的功耗限制。在压力测试中，我们短暂测得的最大功率略低于 59 瓦，然后迅速降至 51 瓦，在接下来的测试过程中功率下降得更多。原则上，65 瓦的电源已经足够，但它的高温确实让我们担心--尽管笔记本电脑的永久耗电量离额定功率还有一段距离。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.23 / 0.51 WattIdle 5.4 / 10.5 / 10.9 Watt

Load

47.8 / 58.6 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRyzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2550 1TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrR7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"Average AMD Radeon 890M Average of class Multimedia Power Consumption24%-38%-0%21%-34%-8%-34%Idle Minimum * (Watt)5.44.2 22%6.1 -13%5 7%3.6 33%4.2 22%5.78 ?(2.4 - 11.8, n=20) -7%6 ?(2.1 - 31.3, n=65, last 2 years) -11%Idle Average * (Watt)10.55.6 47%13.5 -29%6.2 41%5.7 46%11.6 -10%8 ?(3.6 - 12.3, n=20) 24%10.5 ?(4.6 - 38.3, n=65, last 2 years) -0%Idle Maximum * (Watt)10.97.8 28%13.8 -27%14.7 -35%6.1 44%12.3 -13%9.55 ?(5.5 - 15.9, n=20) 12%12.6 ?(6 - 41.6, n=65, last 2 years) -16%Load Average * (Watt)47.828.3 41%63.6 -33%49.9 -4%52.5 -10%61.9 -29%64.5 ?(42.2 - 93.4, n=19) -35%69.3 ?(15.1 - 129.3, n=61, last 2 years) -45%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)49.238.8 21%67 -36%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)46.738.2 18%64.6 -38%Load Maximum * (Watt)58.661.9 -6%109.7 -87%65 -11%64.7 -10%140.6 -140%78.6 ?(56.4 - 109.8, n=20) -34%115.2 ?(40 - 282, n=64, last 2 years) -97%Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)54.546.657* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø52 (50.3-58.6) Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø8.36 (7.65-9.94) Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø49.2 (48.6-49.8)

Power consumption with external monitor

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø45.6 (43.8-50.9) Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø47.4 (44-50.3) Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.2 (27.4-48) Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø46.7 (45.1-52.7) Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø50 (48.2-55.8) Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.42 (5.8-7.3) Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø46.7 (30.7-53.8)

运行时间充电曲线该设备的电池续航时间与 78 瓦时的电池配合使用，总体上非常出色，因此 Zenbook S 16 与 Galaxy Book4 Pro 16相媲美。Galaxy Book4 16 的高通版本可能更高效，但由于电池容量较小，其电池续航时间仍然明显较短。

在 150 cd/m²（相当于测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 66%）的 WLAN 测试中，我们测得的时间为 10:40 小时（60 Hz）和 9:27 小时（120 Hz）。在全亮度条件下，这些数值分别降低到 7:47 小时（60 Hz）和 7:27 小时（120 Hz）。在 150 cd/m² 下可播放视频 20 小时，在全亮度下可播放 HDR 视频不到 6 小时。

在设备打开的情况下，充满一次电需要 127 分钟，79 分钟后可恢复 80% 的电量。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

10h 40min

WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness

7h 47min

Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p

20h 04min

Load (maximum brightness)

1h 47min

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRyzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 78 WhSamsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 61.8 WhDell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 90 WhHP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrR7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 WhSamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 76 WhXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 WhAverage of class Multimedia Battery runtime-16%-2%-11%-4%26%-8%H.264 (h)20.114.7 -27%19.1 -5%21.8 8%15.8 ?(8.3 - 24.6, n=30, last 2 years) -21%WiFi v1.3 (h)10.77.4 -31%11.4 7%7.7 -28%10.7 0%16.4 53%11.3 ?(4.37 - 19.6, n=65, last 2 years) 6%Load (h)1.82 11%1.6 -11%1.9 6%1.7 -6%2.1 17%1.653 ?(0.833 - 2.47, n=31, last 2 years) -8%

Pros+ 纤薄稳定的机身

+ 快速高效的 AMD Zen5 处理器

+ 亮丽的 120-Hz OLED

+ 非常出色的系统性能

+ 丰富的连接功能

+ USB 4 和 Wi-Fi 7

+ 舒适的键盘

+ 良好的音响系统

+ 电池寿命长Cons- 内存无法升级

- PWM 闪烁

- 热电源

结论 - 华硕 Zenbook S 16 是一款出色的全能型产品新款华硕 Zenbook S 16 在我们的测试中给人留下了美好的印象，它是目前市场上最好的全能笔记本之一。其高品质的纤薄机身让笔记本的稳定性丝毫不打折扣，在日常使用中，你不会缺少足够的连接（包括 USB-A）或舒适的键盘。它的扬声器非常出色，除了一些强烈的反光之外，我们对该设备的 OLED 显示屏没有什么可抱怨的。它在 HDR 模式下的亮度可以更好一些，但画质非常出色，华硕还为 sRGB 和 P3 色彩空间提供了非常准确的配置文件。

全新的 AMD Zen 5 处理器同样给人留下了深刻印象，尤其是在 CPU 性能方面。尽管 Zenbook S 16 的功耗限制较低，仅为 33/28 瓦，但仍可与能耗更高的英特尔 CPU 相媲美。新的 Radeon GPU 也带来了优势，不过这个优势并不像很多人想象的那么大。如需了解更多比较信息，请参阅我们对新款 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370和 Radeon 890M.Zenbook 的散热系统在总体上保持了相当的安静，只要你忽略两种性能模式（无论如何，这两种模式都不会带来太多的性能提升）。

新款 Zenbook S 16 是不带专用 GPU 的最佳全能笔记本电脑之一，其快速高效的 Zen 5 处理器、高品质的外壳、出色的 OLED 面板和丰富的连接选项给人留下了深刻印象。作为一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑，您还可以使用所有先进的人工智能功能，而无需处理 ARM 设备所面临的兼容性问题。

这款笔记本电脑的缺点确实不多。目前，并非所有的驱动程序都已完全成熟，例如在尝试运行F1 24时会导致设备崩溃，但目前我们测试的所有三款最新的 Zen 5 设备都还存在这个问题，应该很快就会通过更新得到纠正。它在压力测试中的表现也应该得到优化。除此以外，你自然不得不提到它极其紧凑的电源，在负载情况下，它的温度实在太高了。此外，它的 2 百万像素网络摄像头还可以做得更好。

得益于更快的 NPU，Zenbook S 16 还是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑，因此用户可以使用所有附加的人工智能功能，如实时字幕。这样一来，它就不会面临当前高通笔记本电脑必须面对的任何兼容性问题。它最大的竞争对手是三星 Galaxy Book4 Pro 16和 Edge 16.搭载英特尔处理器的 Pro 机型不得不放弃额外的人工智能功能，而且声音也变大了，而搭载骁龙处理器的 Edge 16 则更安静，但不得不面对兼容性问题--此外，由于电池容量较小，它的运行时间也较短。在连接和显示屏方面，华硕的优势在于软件调光，而 Zenbook 的键盘则更为舒适。从价格上看，这两款设备并无太大差别，但提供的功能却不相上下。

价格和供应情况新款 Zenbook S 16 可直接从华硕网站购买。购买，价格从 1,699.99 美元起。

请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W

- 09/03/2024 v8

Andreas Osthoff

Chassis89 / 98 → 91%

Keyboard87%

Pointing Device93%

Connectivity74 / 80 → 92%

Weight69 / 20-74 → 90%

Battery88 / 95 → 93%

Display85%

Games Performance50 / 88 → 57%

Application Performance85 / 92 → 93%

Temperature84%

Noise90 / 95 → 95%

Audio85%

Camera33 / 75 → 43%

Average65%

85%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials50%Packaging50%Power Use84.6%Repairability40%Software Updates22.3% Total Sustainability Score: 41.2%

More articles related to this deviceAsus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W (Zenbook S16 Series)News•Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen... |Review•AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 ... |Review•AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 -...

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 464 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 681433 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!